APIServer dry-run and kubectl diff
Author: Antoine Pelisse (Google Cloud, @apelisse)
Declarative configuration management, also known as configuration-as-code, is
one of the key strengths of Kubernetes. It allows users to commit the desired state of
the cluster, and to keep track of the different versions, improve auditing and
automation through CI/CD pipelines. The Apply working-group
is working on fixing some of the gaps, and is happy to announce that Kubernetes
1.13 promoted server-side dry-run and kubectl diff to beta. These
two features are big improvements for the Kubernetes declarative model.
Challenges
A few pieces are still missing in order to have a seamless declarative experience with Kubernetes, and we tried to address some of these:
- While compilers and linters do a good job to detect errors in pull-requests
for code, a good validation is missing for Kubernetes configuration files.
The existing solution is to run
kubectl apply --dry-run, but this runs a local dry-run that doesn’t talk to the server: it doesn’t have server validation and doesn’t go through validating admission controllers. As an example, Custom resource names are only validated on the server so a local dry-run won’t help. - It can be difficult to know how your object is going to be applied by the
server for multiple reasons:
- Defaulting will set some fields to potentially unexpected values,
- Mutating webhooks might set fields or clobber/change some values.
- Patch and merges can have surprising effects and result in unexpected objects. For example, it can be hard to know how lists are going to be ordered once merged.
The working group has tried to address these problems.
APIServer dry-run
APIServer dry-run was implemented to address these two problems:
- it allows individual requests to the apiserver to be marked as “dry-run”,
- the apiserver guarantees that dry-run requests won’t be persisted to storage,
- the request is still processed as typical request: the fields are defaulted, the object is validated, it goes through the validation admission chain, and through the mutating admission chain, and then the final object is returned to the user as it normally would, without being persisted.
While dynamic admission controllers are not supposed to have side-effects on each request, dry-run requests are only processed if all admission controllers explicitly announce that they don’t have any dry-run side-effects.
How to enable it
Server-side dry-run is enabled through a feature-gate. Now that the feature is
Beta in 1.13, it should be enabled by default, but still can be enabled/disabled
using kube-apiserver --feature-gates DryRun=true.
If you have dynamic admission controllers, you might have to fix them to:
- Remove any side-effects when the dry-run parameter is specified on the webhook request,
- Specify in the
sideEffectsfield of theadmissionregistration.k8s.io/v1beta1.Webhookobject to indicate that the object doesn’t have side-effects on dry-run (or at all).
How to use it
You can trigger the feature from kubectl by using kubectl apply
--server-dry-run, which will decorate the request with the dryRun flag
and return the object as it would have been applied, or an error if it would
have failed.
Kubectl diff
APIServer dry-run is convenient because it lets you see how the object would be
processed, but it can be hard to identify exactly what changed if the object is
big. kubectl diff does exactly what you want by showing the differences between
the current “live” object and the new “dry-run” object. It makes it very
convenient to focus on only the changes that are made to the object, how the
server has merged these and how the mutating webhooks affects the output.
How to use it
kubectl diff is meant to be as similar as possible to kubectl apply:
kubectl diff -f some-resources.yaml will show a diff for the resources in the yaml file. One can even use the diff program of their choice by using the KUBECTL_EXTERNAL_DIFF environment variable, for example:
KUBECTL_EXTERNAL_DIFF=meld kubectl diff -f some-resources.yaml
What’s next
The working group is still busy trying to improve some of these things:
- Server-side apply is trying to improve the apply scenario, by adding owner semantics to fields! It’s also going to improve support for CRDs and unions!
- Some kubectl apply features are missing from diff and could be useful, like the ability to filter by label, or to display pruned resources.
- Eventually, kubectl diff will use server-side apply!